
Harry Potter author JK Rowling has launched a US book tour - her first in seven years - with a mass signing event in Los Angeles.
Link to the article.
"The least of learning is done in the classrooms." Thomas Merton

The new law passed in Australia allows music fans to make song copies regardless of the format, provided they are solely made for private and domestic use. It also restricts people uploading the copied files onto the internet, but they are allowed to be played on devices such as car sound systems or personal computers.
Under the Copyright Ordinance in Hong Kong, unauthorised copying of a work in any material forms or stored in any medium by electronic means would constitute an infringement of copyright.
"Format-shifting appears on its face to be civilly actionable in Hong Kong," said Michael Pendleton, an intellectual property law expert at the Chinese University of Hong Kong. He said the situation would be clearer if the government followed Australia's example and amended the ordinance.
A spokesman for the Commerce and Economic Development Bureau said they had been closely monitoring recent developments in intellectual property policy overseas.
"For the new time and format shifting exceptions introduced by the Australian government, we will consider including this subject for public consultation in our next round of review," the spokesman said.
But the music industry was sceptical about relaxation of copyright law.
Ricky Fung Tim-chee, chief executive of International Federation of the Phonographic Industry (Hong Kong Group), said intellectual property issues should be decided by copyright holders and determined by market forces.
"The grey areas are hard to define. Is it still under the definition of domestic use if I copy the music to my portable device and lend it to my friends?" he said. He said the music industry had never taken legal action against individuals who format-shift music, given it was "too hard to enforce".
Ip Iam-chong of Hong Kong In-media, an advocate for the concept of "fair use", said it was time for the government to step up and protect the users' interests.
"The copyright ordinance in Hong Kong has been in favour of the copyright owners," Mr Ip said. "Fair use is rejected by the industry and they have simply equalled property rights to copyrights."
What's illegal
Civil offences
A copyright owner can take civil action against any person who infringes the copyright in the work. In general, the owner has the exclusive right to copy the work and to distribute it to the public.
Criminal offences

| The chief executive yesterday responded to the recent rise in conservation controversies by setting up a Commissioner for Heritage Office and a partnership scheme under the Development Bureau to revitalize seven historic buildings. Donald Tsang will set aside HK$1 billion for the scheme to help nonprofit organizations renovate and reuse historic buildings for social enterprises. Conservation initiatives for three sites were also announced - a HK$1.8 billion facelift for the Central Police Station compound, removing a former police married quarters from the land sale list for one year, and the complete preservation of the Wan Chai bazaar. But critics say the measures lack long-term vision and are only piecemeal in approach. The seven government-owned buildings in the revitalization scheme range from Grade I buildings to those not yet graded, including the 76-year- old Lui Seng Chun in Mong Kok and the North Kowloon Magistracy. After vetting, the bureau will offer financial support to successful applicants, such as a one-off grant to cover renovation costs, nominal rentals, or a possible grant to meet starting costs and operating deficits within two years. The bureau has earmarked HK$1 billion from the Capital Works Reserve Fund for renovation purposes. Government sources said this should be adequate for the current phase, which will continue if there is demand. The scheme will begin accepting applications early next year. Tsang's only reference to King Yin Lei, the Stubbs Road mansion that triggered controversy recently, was that the government would provide economic incentives for private owners to protect historic buildings. A Commissioner for Heritage Office will be set up in the Development Bureau to oversee heritage policy. Attempts to defuse potential conservation controversies were made. A HK$1.8 billion revitalization plan for the Central Police Station compound on Hollywood Road has been proposed by the Hong Kong Jockey Club and accepted by the bureau. The former Police Married Quarters on Aberdeen Street will be removed from the land sale list for a year and revitalization proposals will be invited. The site once housed the Government Central School. The Father of modern China Sun Yat-sen was a student of the school before it moved to Aberdeen Street. Relics were excavated from the site earlier this year. The open-air bazaar on Tai Yuen Street and Cross Street in Wan Chai will be preserved. Earlier the Urban Renewal Authority had proposed relocating the hawkers. Heritage impact assessment will be mandatory for all public works projects, including both monuments and graded buildings. Critics said the measures indicated a good start but failed to offer institutional reform in heritage conservation policy. Others said the initiatives lacked detail and a concrete layout and appear to be just mending holes in the wall. Albert Lai Kwong-tak, chair of the Hong Kong People's Council for Sustainable Development, noted that Tsang's proposals were a positive response to civil society, but failed as a plan targeting a five-year development. Though a heritage policy is no where in sight, Bernard Lim Wan-fung, member of the Antiquities Advisory Board, praised the measures as a pragmatic approach on heritage conservation through specific tasks. The Standard
|
Do you think that we should all use commercial software like Microsoft's for teaching and learning purposes? Students who have learnt using a particular operating system are not likely to use another system in the future. In other words, students who are used to Microsoft's software are quite likely to use it for a long time to come. Should we change this practice?